Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:Quarks and decays.png
The six flavors of quarks and their most likely decay modes. Mass decreases moving from right to left.

A quark (Template:IPAEng, Template:IPAEng or Template:IPAEng[1]) is a generic type of physical particle that forms one of the two basic constituents of matter, the other being the lepton. Various species of quarks combine in specific ways to form protons and neutrons, in each case taking exactly three quarks to make the composite particle in question.

There are six different types of quark, usually known as flavors: up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom. (Their names were chosen arbitrarily based on the need to name them something that could be easily remembered and used.) The up and down varieties are abundant, and are distinguished by (among other things) their electric charge. It is this which makes the difference when quarks clump together to form protons or neutrons: a proton is made up of two up quarks and one down quark, yielding a net charge of +1; while a neutron contains one up quark and two down quarks, yielding a net charge of 0. Quarks are the only fundamental particles that interact through all four of the fundamental forces. Antiparticles of quarks are called antiquarks. Isolated quarks are never found naturally; they are almost always found in groups of two (mesons) or groups of three (baryons) called hadrons. This is a direct consequence of confinement.


The following table summarizes the key properties of the six known quarks:

Generation Weak
Flavor Name Symbol Charge
Antiparticle Symbol
1 Iz=+½ Up Template:SubatomicParticle +⅔ 1.5 – 4.0 Antiup Template:SubatomicParticle
1 Iz=-½ Down Template:SubatomicParticle -⅓ 4 – 8 Antidown Template:SubatomicParticle
2 C=1 Charm Template:SubatomicParticle +⅔ 1150 – 1350 Anticharm Template:SubatomicParticle
2 S=-1 Strange Template:SubatomicParticle -⅓ 80 – 130 Antistrange Template:SubatomicParticle
3 T=1 Top Template:SubatomicParticle +⅔ 170900 ± 1800[2] Antitop Template:SubatomicParticle
3 B'=-1 Bottom Template:SubatomicParticle -⅓ 4100 – 4400 Antibottom Template:SubatomicParticle


Each quark is assigned a baryon number, B  =  1/3, and a vanishing lepton number L  =  0. They have fractional electric charge, Q, either Q  =  +2/3 or Q  =  −1/3. The former are called up-type quarks, the latter, down-type quarks. Each quark is assigned a weak isospin: Tz  =  +1/2 for an up-type quark and Tz  =  −1/2 for a down-type quark. Each doublet of weak isospin defines a generation of quarks. There are three generations, and hence six flavors of quarks — the up-type quark flavors are up, charm and top; the down-type quark flavors are down, strange, and bottom (each list is in the order of increasing mass).

The number of generations of quarks and leptons are equal in the standard model. The number of generations of leptons with a light neutrino is strongly constrained by experiments at the LEP in CERN and by observations of the abundance of helium in the universe. Precision measurement of the lifetime of the Z boson at LEP constrains the number of light neutrino generations to be three. Astronomical observations of helium abundance give consistent results. Results of direct searches for a fourth generation give limits on the mass of the lightest possible fourth generation quark. The most stringent limit comes from analysis of results from the Tevatron collider at Fermilab, and shows that the mass of a fourth-generation quark must be greater than 190 GeV. Additional limits on extra quark generations come from measurements of quark mixing performed by the experiments Belle and BaBar.

Each flavor defines a quantum number which is conserved under the strong interactions, but not the weak interactions. The magnitude of flavor changing in the weak interaction is encoded into a structure called the CKM matrix. This also encodes the CP violation allowed in the Standard Model. The flavor quantum numbers are described in detail in the article on flavor.


Quantum numbers corresponding to non-Abelian symmetries like rotations require more care in extraction, since they are not additive. In the quark model one builds mesons out of a quark and an antiquark, whereas baryons are built from three quarks. Since mesons are bosons (having integer spins) and baryons are fermions (having half-integer spins), the quark model implies that quarks are fermions. Further, the fact that the lightest baryons have spin-1/2 implies that each quark can have spin S  =  1/2. The spins of excited mesons and baryons are completely consistent with this assignment.


Since quarks are fermions, the Pauli exclusion principle implies that the three valence quarks must be in an antisymmetric combination in a baryon. However, the charge Q =  2 baryon, Template:SubatomicParticle (which is one of four isospin Iz  =  3/2 baryons) can only be made of three Template:SubatomicParticle quarks with parallel spins. Since this configuration is symmetric under interchange of the quarks, it implies that there exists another internal quantum number, which would then make the combination antisymmetric. This is given the name "color", although it has nothing to do with the perception of the frequency (or wavelength) of light, which is the usual meaning of color. This quantum number is the charge involved in the gauge theory called quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

The only other colored particle is the gluon, which is the gauge boson of QCD. Like all other non-Abelian gauge theories (and unlike quantum electrodynamics) the gauge bosons interact with one another by the same force that affects the quarks.

Color is a gauged SU(3) symmetry. Quarks are placed in the fundamental representation, 3, and hence come in three colors (red, green, and blue). Gluons are placed in the adjoint representation, 8, and hence come in eight varieties.

Confinement and quark properties

Every subatomic particle is completely described by a small set of observables such as mass m and quantum numbers, such as spin b and parity r. Usually these properties are directly determined by experiments. However, confinement makes it impossible to measure these properties of quarks. Instead, they must be inferred from measurable properties of the composite particles which are made up of quarks. Such inferences are usually most easily made for certain additive quantum numbers called flavors.

The composite particles made of quarks and antiquarks are the hadrons. These include the mesons which get their quantum numbers from a quark and an antiquark, and the baryons, which get theirs from three quarks. The quarks (and antiquarks) which impart quantum numbers to hadrons are called valence quarks. Apart from these, any hadron may contain an indefinite number of virtual quarks, antiquarks and gluons which together contribute nothing to their quantum numbers. Such virtual quarks are called sea quarks.

It is now believed that so-called "neutron stars", collapsed remnants of a massive star in which the protons and electrons degenerate and combine to form neutrons, might actually exist instead in the form of up, down and strange quarks as a single "atom" in what is called a quark star.

Free quarks

1974 discovery photograph of a possible charmed baryon, now identified as the Template:SubatomicParticle

No search for free quarks or fractional electric charges has returned convincing evidence. The absence of free quarks has therefore been incorporated into the notion of confinement, which, it is believed, the theory of quarks must possess. This was expounded upon by Frank Wilczek, H. David Politzer and David Gross who concluded that the more quarks separated, the greater the attraction due to the strong force, making it impossible to separate the quarks into free particles. This has been called asymptotic freedom, for which Wilczek was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2004.[citation needed]

Confinement began as an experimental observation, and is expected to follow from the modern theory of strong interactions, called quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Although there is no mathematical derivation of confinement in QCD, it is easy to show using lattice gauge theory.

However, it may be possible to change the confinement by creating dense or hot quark matter. These new phases of QCD matter have been predicted theoretically, and experimental searches for them have now started at the RHIC. Under some theories, sufficient energy input [by high-speed relativistic collisions such as at the RHIC and planned at the LHC might also generate strange quarks arising from the vacuum, which could recombine with the up and down quarks to form a new type of nucleon called a strangelet or strange quark matter. Wilczek cautioned that there might be concern for an "ice-9" type reaction, in which a strangelet engaged in runaway fusion with normal nuclei, in a Letter[3] to the Editor of Scientific American in 1999. However, he concluded that there likely should be no cause for concern, as most theories[4][5] show such strangelets to be positively charged, and would repulse normal nuclei due to the charge repulsion of Coulomb's law.

Quark masses

Although one speaks of quark mass in the same way as the mass of any other particle, the notion of mass for quarks is complicated by the fact that quarks cannot be found free in nature. As a result, the notion of a quark mass is a theoretical construct, which makes sense only when one specifies exactly the procedure used to define it.

Current quark mass

The approximate chiral symmetry of quantum chromodynamics, for example, allows one to define the ratio between various (up, down and strange) quark masses through combinations of the masses of the pseudo-scalar meson octet in the quark model through chiral perturbation theory, giving

<math>\frac{m_u}{m_d}=0.56\qquad{\rm and}\qquad\frac{m_s}{m_d}=20.1.</math>

The fact that the up quark has mass is important, since there would be no strong CP problem if it were massless. The absolute values of the masses are currently determined from QCD sum rules (also called spectral function sum rules) and lattice QCD. Masses determined in this manner are called current quark masses. The connection between different definitions of the current quark masses needs the full machinery of renormalization for its specification.

Valence quark mass

Another, older, method of specifying the quark masses was to use the Gell-Mann-Nishijima mass formula in the quark model, which connect hadron masses to quark masses. The masses so determined are called constituent quark masses, and are significantly different from the current quark masses defined above. The constituent masses do not have any further dynamical meaning.

Heavy quark masses

The masses of the heavy charm and bottom quarks are obtained from the masses of hadrons containing a single heavy quark (and one light antiquark or two light quarks) and from the analysis of quarkonia. Lattice QCD computations using the heavy quark effective theory (HQET) or non-relativistic quantum chromodynamics (NRQCD) are currently used to determine these quark masses.

The top quark is sufficiently heavy that perturbative QCD can be used to determine its mass. Before its discovery in 1995, the best theoretical estimates of the top quark mass are obtained from global analysis of precision tests of the Standard Model. The top quark, however, is unique amongst quarks in that it decays before having a chance to hadronize. Thus, its mass can be directly measured from the resulting decay products. This can only be done at the Tevatron which is the only particle accelerator energetic enough to produce top quarks in abundance.


The additive quantum numbers of antiquarks are equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to those of the quarks. CPT symmetry forces them to have the same spin and mass as the corresponding quark. Tests of CPT symmetry cannot be performed directly on quarks and antiquarks, due to confinement, but can be performed on hadrons. Notation of antiquarks follows that of antimatter in general: an up quark is denoted by Template:SubatomicParticle, and an up antiquark is denoted by Template:SubatomicParticle.


Some extensions of the Standard Model begin with the assumption that quarks and leptons have substructure. In other words, these models assume that the elementary particles of the Standard Model are in fact composite particles, made of some other elementary constituents. Such an assumption is open to experimental tests, and these theories are severely constrained by data. At present there is no evidence for such substructure. For more details see the article on preons.


The notion of quarks evolved out of a classification of hadrons developed independently in 1961 by Murray Gell-Mann and Kazuhiko Nishijima, which nowadays goes by the name of the quark model. The scheme grouped together particles with isospin and strangeness using a unitary symmetry derived from current algebra, which we today recognize as part of the approximate chiral symmetry of QCD. This is a global flavor SU(3) symmetry, which should not be confused with the gauge symmetry of QCD.

In this scheme the lightest mesons (spin-0) and baryons (spin-½) are grouped together into octets, 8, of flavor symmetry. A classification of the spin-3/2 baryons into the representation 10 yielded a prediction of a new particle, Template:SubatomicParticle, the discovery of which in 1964 led to wide acceptance of the model. The missing representation 3 was identified with quarks.

This scheme was called the eightfold way by Gell-Mann, a clever conflation of the octets of the model with the eightfold way of Buddhism. He also chose the name quark and attributed it to the sentence “Three quarks for Muster Mark” in James Joyce's Finnegans Wake.[6] In reply to the common claim that he did not actually believe that quarks were real physical entities, Gell-Mann has been quoted as saying - "That is baloney. I have explained so many times that I believed from the beginning that quarks were confined inside objects like neutrons and protons, and in my early papers on quarks I described how they could be confined either by an infinite mass and infinite binding energy, or by a potential rising to infinity, which is what we believe today to be correct. Unfortunately, I referred to confined quarks as 'fictitious', meaning that they could not emerge to be utilized for applications such as catalysing nuclear fusion."[7]

Analysis of certain properties of high energy reactions of hadrons led Richard Feynman to postulate substructures of hadrons, which he called partons (since they form part of hadrons). A scaling of deep inelastic scattering cross sections derived from current algebra by James Bjorken received an explanation in terms of partons. When Bjorken scaling was verified in an experiment in 1969, it was immediately realized that partons and quarks could be the same thing. With the proof of asymptotic freedom in QCD in 1973 by David Gross, Frank Wilczek and David Politzer the connection was firmly established.

The charm quark was postulated by Sheldon Glashow, John Iliopoulos and Luciano Maiani in 1970 to prevent unphysical flavor changes in weak decays which would otherwise occur in the standard model. The discovery in 1974 of the meson which came to be called the J/ψ led to the recognition that it was made of a charm quark and its antiquark.

The existence of a third generation of quarks was predicted by Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa in 1973 who realized that the observed violation of CP symmetry by neutral kaons could not be accommodated into the Standard Model with two generations of quarks. The bottom quark was discovered in 1977 and the top quark in 1996 at the Tevatron collider in Fermilab.

Origin of the word

The word was originally coined by Murray Gell-Mann as a nonsense word rhyming with "pork"[8], but without a spelling. Later, he found the word "quark" in James Joyce's book Finnegans Wake, and used the spelling but not the pronunciation:

Three quarks for Muster Mark!
Sure he has not got much of a bark
And sure any he has it's all beside the mark.

In this context, the word rhymes with "mark", and "bark", but the physics term is pronounced "kwork". Gell-Mann's own explanation:[9][10]

In 1963, when I assigned the name "quark" to the fundamental constituents of the nucleon, I had the sound first, without the spelling, which could have been "kwork". Then, in one of my occasional perusals of Finnegans Wake, by James Joyce, I came across the word "quark" in the phrase "Three quarks for Muster Mark". Since "quark" (meaning, for one thing, the cry of the gull) was clearly intended to rhyme with "Mark," as well as "bark" and other such words, I had to find an excuse to pronounce it as "kwork". But the book represents the dream of a publican named Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker. Words in the text are typically drawn from several sources at once, like the "portmanteau" words in "Through the Looking Glass". From time to time, phrases occur in the book that are partially determined by calls for drinks at the bar. I argued, therefore, that perhaps one of the multiple sources of the cry "Three quarks for Muster Mark" might be "Three quarts for Mister Mark," in which case the pronunciation "kwork" would not be totally unjustified. In any case, the number three fitted perfectly the way quarks occur in nature.

The phrase "three quarks" is a particularly good fit (as mentioned in the above quote), as at the time, there were only three known quarks, and since quarks appear in groups of three in baryons.

In Joyce's use, it is seabirds giving "three quarks", akin to three cheers, "quark" having a meaning of the cry of a gull (probably onomatopoeia, like "quack" for ducks). The word is also a pun on the relationship between Munster and its provincial capital, Cork.

See also

References and external links

  1. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quark and Oxford University Press, 2005
  2. "Summary of Top Mass Results - March 2007".
  3. Scientific American, July, 1999
  4. However, even that is not certain if the enchanced stability of the strangelet causes spontaneous fusion. Further, other theories show neutral or negative strangelets where this would not be a barrier. >"Search for Neutral Strangelets at the E864 experiment"; Marcelo Munhoz (Wayne State University) ABSTRACT: The E864 experiment is a large acceptance forward spectrometer designed to search for exotic composite objects potentially produced in relativistic Au+Pb collisions at the Brookhaven AGS. Among these objects are the strangelets, hadrons composed of approximately equal numbers of u, d, and s quarks, and, consequently, characterized by low charge to mass ratios. Its existence cannot be resolved through theorethical predictions, so the solution relies on experimental measurements. This work represents the first attempt to look for neutral strangelets, made possible due to the excellent performance of the E864 hadronic calorimeter. No neutral strangelets were observed in the 1995 run data set, but we set production limits for these exotic objects, in the mass range 6<A<100. The limit is rather insensitive to the details of production models thanks to the large acceptance of the E864 spectrometer. "Properties of exotic matter for heavy-ion searches" J Schaffner-Bielich et al 1997 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 23 2107-2115 doi:10.1088/0954-3899/23/12/036; J Schaffner-Bielich, C Greiner, H Stöcker§ and A P Vischer; Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Institut für Theoretische Physik, Justus-Liebig Universität, D-35392 Giessen, Germany; Institut für Theoretische Physik, J W Goethe-Universität, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany; Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; ABSTRACT: We examine the properties of both forms of strange matter, small lumps of strange quark matter (strangelets) and of strange hadronic matter (metastable exotic multihypernuclear objects (MEMOs)) and their relevance for present and future heavy-ion searches. The strong and weak decays are discussed separately to distinguish between long- and short-lived candidates where the former ones are detectable in present heavy-ion experiments while the latter ones are present in future heavy-ion experiments, respectively. We find some long-lived strangelet candidates which are highly negatively charged with a mass-to-charge ratio like a anti deuteron but masses of A = 10 - 16. We also predict many short-lived candidates, both in quark and hadronic form, which can be highly charged. Purely hyperonic nuclei such as the are bound and have a negative charge while carrying a positive baryon number. We also demonstrate that multiply charmed exotics (charmlets) might be bound and can be produced at future heavy-ion colliders. Print publication: Issue 12 (December 1997)
  5. "New Solutions for the Color-Flavored Locked Strangelets"; G.X. Peng, X.J.Wen, and Y.D. Chen, of the China Center of Advanced Science (World Lab.) [Beijing], the Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing], and the Center for Theoretical Physics MIT [Cambridge], respectively; December 9, 2005
  6. quark 1. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000
  7. Rodgers 2003.
  8. Gribbin, John. "Richard Feynman: A Life in Science" Dutton 1997, pg 194.
  9. Gell-Mann, Murray (1995). The Quark and the Jaguar. Owl Books. p. 180. ISBN 978-0805072532.
  10. Take Our Word For It, page two, Words to the Wise

Primary and secondary sources

Other references


ar:كوارك ast:Quark bn:কোয়ার্ক bs:Kvark bg:Кварк ca:Quark cs:Kvark da:Kvark (fysik) de:Quark (Physik) et:Kvargid el:Κουάρκ eo:Kvarko fa:کوارک ga:Cuarc gl:Quark ko:쿼크 hr:Kvark id:Quark is:Kvarki it:Quark (particella) he:קווארק ku:Kuark la:Quarcum lv:Kvarki lt:Kvarkas hu:Kvark mk:Кварк ml:ക്വാര്‍ക്ക് ms:Kuark nl:Quark no:Kvark nn:Kvark uz:Kvark simple:Quark sk:Kvark sl:Kvark sr:Кварк sh:Kvark fi:Kvarkki sv:Kvark ta:குவார்க் uk:Кварк ur:کوارک Template:WikiDoc Sources